Search This Blog

Showing posts with label car seat safety. Show all posts
Showing posts with label car seat safety. Show all posts

Thursday, August 12, 2010

How safe is a sling?

I love numbers.  Nothing puts things in perspective better than seeing the numbers laid out for you in black & white.  So with the rash of bad publicity that baby slings have garnered in the media lately, due to the recall of the Infantino slings. I loved reading this article with ALL the numbers right there to put it all into perspective.

Like anything safety comes first and a misused sling can be just as dangerous as a misused car seat. It's up to the parents and caregivers to read the instructions on products and to research and educated them selves about the equipment they use with their children.  Baby Carriers like slings are perfectly safe when they are used properly.



How safe are baby slings? About as safe as it gets ….

To put the safety of infant slings in perspective, here are a few numbers for you:

The likelihood you’ll get struck by lightning — 1:280,000.
The odds that you’ll die of a tsunami in the US — 1:500,000.
The odds an earth-impacting asteroid will kill you — between 1:200,000 and 1:500,000
The odds your infant will die in a car accident — 21:100,000
The odds your infant will die from a circumcision procedure — 1:500,000
The odds your infant will die in an infant sling — 1:700,000
 HERE to read the entire article on Wrapsody

Monday, June 28, 2010

Rear Facing: It does a Toddler Good!

Every country and province/state has their own laws about car seats- rear facing and forward facing- and booster seats, but are the current legal recommendations in your area in the best interest for the safety of your child(ren)?  I have found that like most things, the federal governments tend to err on the lower side of the caution scale, which can leave parents confused as to what to do.

Right now in Canada the current "recommendation"- and seriously, this is just their "safety tip", not a law- is to keep babies rear facing for at least the first 12 months:



safety tip Don't be in a hurry to start using a forward-facing child seat. The longer you use a rear-facing infant-only seat, infant /child seat, or infant/child/booster seat that fits correctly, even past your baby's first birthday, the safer your baby will be in a crash. Be sure to follow the manufacturer's instructions for use and check the label for the weight and height that are allowed. 

http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/roadsafety/safedrivers-childsafety-car-cartime-stage1-221.htm

But is rear facing till 12 months really enough to insure the safety of your child?  According to various European countries, no it isn't.  In the UK doctors are warning that children should be kept rear facing until they are 4 years old!


'Use rear-facing car seats up to age of 4', warn doctors

By Daily Mail Reporter

Parents should keep children in rear-facing car seats up to the age of four, say doctors.
Switching to forward-facing ones before that is dangerous and could result in spinal injury in an accident.
There is compelling evidence that children's lives are being put at risk even though parents believe they are doing the best for them, doctors claim.
Mother and baby driving in car with baby in front seat baby 
carrier
Safest: Parents should keep young children in rear-facing car seats for as long as possible
They have published an alert on the British Medical Journal website (bmj.com) advising parents to keep young children in rear-facing seats for as long as possible.
Dr Elizabeth Watson, a GP, and Dr Michael Monteiro, who specialises in facial injuries at the Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, say several studies show this is safest.
Many parents switch babies from rear-facing seats to a forward-facing one when they reach 20lb.

That could be as early as eight months of age for an average boy
Canadian CTV News Reports:
British Drs. Elizabeth Watson and Michael Monteiro reviewed the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's vehicle crash database, focusing on incidents involving 870 children between 1998 and 2003. They also looked at data from Sweden, where rear-facing children up to age four is common practice.
The researchers found that children up to 23 months sustained fewer injuries in any kind of crash when they were in seats facing backward.
Some toddlers who died in accidents while in forward-facing seats could have survived had they been facing the rear, the researchers say they found.
Toddlers seem to be at increased risk of severe injury when they're in front-facing seats in head-on collisions because of their relatively large heads, the authors contend.
"Excessive stretching or even transection (severing) of the spinal cord can result if a child is involved in a head-on crash while in a forward facing car seat. The younger the child, the lower the crash force required to cause spinal injury," they write.
Rear-facing seats are more effective at keeping the head, neck and spine aligned, distributing the force of the crash more evenly across those areas, they say.
The authors say many parents and healthcare providers are unaware it is safer to leave children in rear-facing seats for as long as possible.
"Parents and guardians should be advised to keep young children in rear facing seats for as long as possible," the researchers conclude in their study, published on the website of the British Medical Journal.
They called on manufacturers and retailers to increase the availability of rear-facing seats for older children. They also called for a change to the current weight-range labelling of European seats, which suggest that forward- and rear-facing seats are equally safe for kids over 20 pounds.

 Keeping your child rear facing reduces the risk of serious neck and chest injuries in a collision- something that there are now multiple studies on from the US, Canada and various European countries. In the Scandinavian countries, like Sweden, children are regularly kept rear facing until the age of 4- resulting in far fewer toddler deaths and serious injuries due to car crashes.


It is yet another decision that parents have to make for their children: Do you follow the standard "rear facing till 12 months" protocol that the Canadian government calls for, or do you take the initiative and do your own studies and keep your children safer by keeping them rear facing as long as possible?  It's a tough decision for many parents depending on the child and how well they tolerate their car seats in the rear facing position.  Is it safer to have your toddler rear facing if they are screaming for hours on end and distracting the driver of the car?  That is a  decision that only a parent can make according to their own situation.  We turned our youngest daughter around to forward facing at 15 months when we drove across Canada from BC to Ontario.  We made this decision not based on any safety facts at all which is pretty sad.  We turned her forward facing just for convenience because I couldn't hand her snacks  and toys while she was facing away from me.  When we arrived in Toronto I heard about keeping children rear facing longer and we tried to turn her around to rear facing again... but by then she was too set in her ways and refused to sit that way- which is sad as she has always been a tiny pixie and could of remained safely rear facing according to the weight restrictions of her seat until just 6 months ago when she finally topped the 32lb limit...at 4 and a half years old! (I told you she was our "pixie"!).


Needless to say, our youngest son will be kept rear facing for as long as he falls within the limits of his new convertible car seat.


Like all choices that parents have to make informing yourself about the issues, risks and studies that have been done is necessary to make an educated decision.  But before you decide one way or the other, I'd like to you to read Joel's story.  His grandfather Jim tells the story about his grandson, Joel, who was in a front facing, properly installed car seat and broke his neck in a collision. At the time, he was 18 mos & 33 lbs. A big boy for his age-( He survived the crash and is recovering). The accident happened in 2008. But since that time, Joel's grandfather has immersed himself in ERF advocacy, and is still pursuing the powers to be (NHTSA and AAP) to revisit and/or change the 12mo / 20 lb "rule". 


 Here's a link to the video: Joel's YouTube video.
    And a link to the web site Joel's Journey
On Joel's Journey you will find lots of information of Rear Facing advocacy...and updates on Joel's journey to being a happy and healthy toddler!!

Cara Miller writes an excellent article on CPO with lots of facts and information about Rear Facing Toddlers.

So before you go out and spend $150-$200 on a convertible car seat, you might want to research which brands have higher weight/height limits- Safety First, Radian, Britax and Graco all make models that have RF limits that are higher than the usual run of the mill car seats.  It's worth spending the extra money on!!

Thursday, June 24, 2010

"When it comes to Breastfeeding, We can't handle the Truth"

How I missed this article I don't know, but when I read this on the weekend, I think I actually cheered.  The Feminist Breeder Gina speaks freely and without guile - straight to the heart of the matter.  Why DO we pussy foot around the topic of breastfeeding?  Why is it that women are immediately on the defensive when the word "Breastfeeding" is uttered?  We don't get our hackles up nearly so much on other topics.  So Why Breastfeeding?  And why is it that the media is the first to jump on the bank wagon of pushing the "guilt" envelope?

The Feminist Breeder talks about the new study released: Study: Lack of breastfeeding costs lives, billions of dollars - the Journal of Pediatrics published some very serious new findings indicating that 911 babies in America die every year from not being breastfed.  Yes, AMERICA, not a third world country in the equatorial region of the planet!!   She talks about the  breast beating by the public in her article "When it comes to Breastfeeding, We can't handle the Truth".  One of my favourite sections of the article brings the point across perfectly:

" for those Americans only interested in the bottom line, it should be noted that the same study found that if we can get 90% of mothers breastfeeding for the minimum amount of time recommended, then we’d save 13 billion dollars a year in medical costs. (that’s BILLION, with a B, people.)
So what the heck is the problem, then? Why can’t we get on board with this research? The problem is that people don’t want to hear it. But I’ll say it anyway.
Breastfeeding. Saves. Lives.
You know what else saves lives? Car seats. So, why aren’t people spitting mad at the NHTSA for saying that? Why aren’t they leaving thousands of comments on car seat articles saying “But I just couldn’t afford a car seat, why are you trying to make me feel guilty?!?!” Well, maybe it’s because our society will admit that car seats save lives, and we’re willing to give them out free at fire stations and hospitals if we have to because it is that important.
So why aren’t we doing the same for breastfeeding? Why won’t they hand out free breast pumps and visits to a lactation consultant when we know it would save lives and money? Well, I think the obvious answer is that there are breasts involved, and people just lose their minds when female anatomy comes up in conversation.
Of course then people say “It’s her CHOICE to formula-feed – leave her alone!” But I don’t believe that most women are making this “choice.” The CDC shows that 3/4 of women are initiating breastfeeding in the hospital, but only 13.6% of women are still exclusively breastfeeding at 6 months. What this tells me is that somewhere along the way, they gave up on themselves, and the reason I hear most often is, “But, I tried! I just couldn’t make any milk!”
Here is the cold hard truth ladies: You have been lied to."

HERE To read the entire article  on The Feminist Breeder

Yep.  Car seats DO save lives, and our governments have created laws to protect our children and keep them safe..... yet in Canada we can't even get our government to fund vital breastfeeding support services like The Newman Breastfeeding Clinic & Institute, nor will they act to protect breastfeeding by making the WHO International Code  into law.  It's all well for them to talk the talk "Breast is best"... but it's time for them to put their money where their mouth is.

Breast ISN'T Best- Breast is NORMAL.  Get with the program.