Search This Blog

Showing posts with label inductions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label inductions. Show all posts

Friday, March 12, 2010

Amnesty blows the whistle on Maternal Mortality rates in the US

Even Amnesty International sees it, yet main stream medical organizations seems to think that there is absolutely nothing wrong with Maternity care in the US (...and don't be fooled, it's almost as bad in Canada). The maternal death rate has almost doubled since 1987- 6.6 deaths per 100,000 births in 1987 to 13.3 deaths per 100,000 births in 2006. And since there is no federal reporting requirements in the US, the actual death rate may actually be much higher.

Amnesty points a finger at the lack of accessible health care as a reason for America's horrifying statistics (They are currently ranked 40th out of 40 developed nations), but also points to the high rates of Inductions and Caesarean Sections causing the maternal mortality rate to be climbing instead of falling. Currently the US spends the most amount of money on maternity care of any nations on the planet.... yet obviously they are spending too much money pushing medical and surgical interventions and not enough money on supportive health care and natural childbirth education- for parents and medical practitioners alike. Instead of encouraging and funding midwifery training and recognising the role of doulas as an essential part of supporting birthing mothers, they have instituted a dictator-like regime that bans mothers from having VBAC births and takes away their human rights to make decisions on how, where and when they will give birth.

Until ACOG , the CDC , and other major health organizations stop meddling in politics and accepting backdoor funding from companies with conflicting interests, the Maternal Mortality rate will only continue to climb. Because right now, these organizations are only interested in the bottom line instead of getting to the bottom of the reason that mothers are dying in childbirth in the 21st Century.

Too Many Women Dying in U.S. While Having Babies



Read more: http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1971633,00.html#ixzz0i0Lib1Ry

Amnesty International may be best known to American audiences for bringing to light horror stories abroad such as the disappearance of political activists in Argentina or the abysmal conditions inside South African prisons under apartheid. But in a new report on pregnancy and childbirth care in the U.S., Amnesty details the maternal-health care crisis in this country as part of a systemic violation of women's rights.

The report, titled "Deadly Delivery," notes that the likelihood of a woman's dying in childbirth in the U.S. is five times as great as in Greece, four times as great as in Germany and three times as great as in Spain. Every day in the U.S., more than two women die of pregnancy-related causes, with the maternal mortality ratio doubling from 6.6 deaths per 100,000 births in 1987 to 13.3 deaths per 100,000 births in 2006. (And as shocking as these figures are, Amnesty notes that the actual number of maternal deaths in the U.S. may be a lot higher, since there are no federal requirements to report these outcomes and since data collection at the state and local levels needs to be improved.) "In the U.S., we spend more than any country on health care, yet American women are at greater risk of dying from pregnancy-related causes than in 40 other countries," says Nan Strauss, the report's co-author, who spent two years investigating the issue of maternal mortality worldwide. "We thought that was scandalous." (See the most common hospital mishaps.)

According to Amnesty, which gathered data from many sources, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, approximately half of the pregnancy-related deaths in the U.S. are preventable, the result of systemic failures, including barriers to accessing care; inadequate, neglectful or discriminatory care; and overuse of risky interventions like inducing labor and delivering via cesarean section. "Women are not dying from complex, mysterious causes that we don't know how to treat," says Strauss. "Women are dying because it's a fragmented system, and they are not getting the comprehensive services that they need."

The report notes that black women in the U.S. are nearly four times as likely as white women to die from pregnancy-related causes, although they are no more likely to experience certain complications like hemorrhage.

The Amnesty report comes on the heels of an investigation in California that found that maternal deaths have tripled there in recent years, as well as a maternal-mortality alert issued in January by the Joint Commission, a group that accredits hospitals and other medical organizations, which noted that common preventable errors included failure to control blood pressure in hypertensive women and failure to pay attention to vital signs after C-sections. And just this week, a panel of medical experts at a conference held by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) recommended that physicians' organizations revisit policies that prevent women from having vaginal births after having had a cesarean. Such policies, designed in part to protect against litigation, have contributed to the rise of the U.S. cesarean rate to nearly 32% in 2007, the most recent year for which data are available.

The Amnesty report spotlights numerous barriers women face in accessing care, even among those who are insured or qualify for Medicaid. Poverty is a major factor, but all women are put at risk by overuse of obstetrical intervention and barriers to access to more woman-centered, physiologic care provided by family-practice physicians and midwives.

Amnesty is calling on Obama to create an Office of Maternal Health within the Department of Health and Human Services to improve outcomes and reduce disparities, among other recommendations. The report also calls on the government to address the shortage of maternal-care providers.

"Access is only one factor," cautions Maureen Corry, executive director of Childbirth Connection, a research and advocacy organization that recently convened more than 100 stakeholders, including members of the American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists and the NIH, in a large symposium on transforming maternity care. "We need to make sure that we reduce the overuse of interventions that are not always necessary, like C-sections, and increase access to the care that we know is good for mothers and babies, like labor support."

Saturday, January 2, 2010

Hospital Intervention & The Christmas Miracle

I'm sure you've all read the story of the "Christmas Miracle mother and baby" We are all relieved to hear that both mother and baby are doing well, and many would praise the medical personnel for making this miracle happen and saving the lives of this mother and baby.


Some very good articles have come out because of the horrifying experience this family went through. The biggest points that the mainstream media (for the most part) are not reporting are the causes of this nightmare. The media are well focused on the miracle of their survival, yet they have glossed over the blatant links between the medical interventions this woman received and the scary outcome. Both inductions/pitocin and epidural anaesthetic have serious and dangerous side effects, risks that are very rarely explained to labouring mothers in "full disclosure".

As Jasmine Jafferali for The Examiner writes

Whenever a mother receives pitocin, a synthetic form of oxytocin which comes from the pituitary glands of mammals, the mother may have the following side effects:

  • More pain. Eighty percent of mothers reported more pain with pitocin than without
  • Anaphylactic reaction
  • Postpartum hemorrhage
  • Cardiac arrhythmia
  • Fatal afibrinogenemia
  • Hypertensive episodes
  • Nausea/Vomitting
  • Premature ventricular contractions
  • Pelvic hematoma
  • Subarachnoid hemorrhage
  • Hypertensive episodes
  • Rupture of the uterus
Read FAQ's on pitocin at Childbirth.org

What often happens after receiving pitocin, the contractions are so intense the mother opts for the epidural. Pitocin forces the uterus to contract more and more often. Oxytocin which is released naturally from the mother in the body does the same thing, but not as intense.

Within one minute of Hermanstorfer receiving an epidural, she went to cardiac arrest. Approximately 95% of birthing mothers will opt for the epidural, here are its known side effects:

  • Cardiac arrhythmias and/or cardiac arrest
  • Nausea/vomitting/shivering
  • Severe headache caused by leakage of spinal fluid (less than 1% experience this)
  • Can cause labor to slow down and also make contractions weaker
  • Makes pushing more difficult and additional interventions such as Pitocin, forceps, vacuum extraction or cesarean may become necessary
  • Causes fetal heart rate to drop if mother is not repositioned periodically. Laying flat on the back forces the fetus to lay on a main artery that decreases blood flow back to the fetus

Source: American Pregnancy Association and Childbirth.org

In her article Her Survival Was a “Christmas Miracle,” but the Disaster Was Man-Made

Henci Goer writes:

"...according to Dr. Martin, Tracy is an example of how things can go suddenly and horribly wrong for no discernable reason in a healthy woman having a normal labor. All I can say is that Dr. Martin must have slept through the class on epidural complications. Tracy’s story is the classic sequence that follows what anesthesiologists term an “unexpectedly high blockade,” meaning the anesthesiologist injected the epidural anesthetic into the wrong space and it migrated upward, paralyzing breathing muscles and in some cases, stopping the heart. High blockade happens rarely, and even more rarely does it result in full respiratory and cardiac arrest—one database analysis of 11,000 obstetric epidural blocks reported a rate of 1 in 1400 women experiencing a high block and 1 in 5500 requiring intubation, and no woman experienced cardiac arrest. It does happen, though, and I am willing to bet that high blockade and its sequelae happened to Tracy..."

It all comes down to "Full disclosure" of the real risks VS benefits of medical interventions used during the average Labour & Childbirth in North America. I have very serious doubts that many mothers would actively choose either the use of pitocin/induction or epidurals if they were truly made aware of the risks to both themselves and their babies.

For more information :

Medical Risks of Epidural Anesthesia During Childbirth
By
Lewis Mehl-Madrona, M.D., Ph.D. and Morgaine Mehl-Madrona